8.2. Terminated Vista

At the ends of the Street As Room, there is a need to close off the street, and not let it vanish into infinity.

Problem-statement: People need to see landmarks, both to find their way, and to feel a sense of enclosure and spatial definition in the city. This need is particularly acute at the visual ends of streets and paths.

❖ ❖ ❖

Discussion:: Evidence shows that pedestrians are not comfortable walking down long straight streets with endless “vanishing point” perspectives ahead. This experience seems to be disorienting as well as lacking in a sense of enclosure, which in turn is essential to make the street more attractive to pedestrians.¹ Drivers and riders in vehicles also benefit from the identification of wayfinding landmarks.

One of the best ways to handle this need is to interrupt the street with one or more structures along its axis, creating “terminated vistas”. These can be buildings or parts of buildings, natural features, or other landmark elements. The streets can wind around the structures (as in the photo at the beginning of this pattern) or change angle, or simply terminate in a T-intersection.

Jane Jacobs (1961) described this challenge most insightfully in her classic book The Death and Life of Great American Cities, in Chapter Nineteen, “The Uses of Visual Order:”

“[If] a street goes on and on into the distance, with the intensity and intricacy of the foreground apparently dribbling into endless amorphous repetitions of itself and finally petering into the utter anonymity of distance, we are also getting a visual announcement that clearly says endlessness… The general effect is bound to be chaotic… Therefore a good many city streets (not all) need visual interruptions, cutting off the indefinite distant view and at the same time visually heightening and celebrating intense street use by giving it a hint of enclosure and entity. Bridges that connect two buildings up above a street sometimes do this service; so do buildings which themselves bridge a street. Occasional large buildings (preferably with public significance) can be placed across straight streets at ground level — Grand Central Terminal in New York is a well-known example. Straight, “endless” streets can be interrupted and the street itself divided around a square or plaza forming the interruption; this square can be occupied by a building. In cases where vehicular traffic can actually be dead-ended on straight streets, small parks could be thrown across from sidewalk to sidewalk; the visual interruption or diversion would be provided here by groves of trees or by small (and, let us hope, cheerful) park structures. In still other cases, a visual diversion need not extend across a straight street, but can be in the form of a building or group of buildings set forward from the normal building line to make a jog, with the sidewalk cut underneath.”2

Jacobs also referred to the argument of Kevin Lynch, author of the classic Image of the City,3 that a city needs to create “imageability” through its landmarks, and through the relationship of its paths and nodes. Jacobs also noted that sometimes geographic interruptions can serve the same purpose, such as the hills of San Francisco.

The hills of San Francisco serve as natural terminated vistas, enhanced by added monuments like Coit Tower. Photo by Erica Chang via Wikimedia Commons.

❖ ❖ ❖

Therefore:

Plan streets to have periodic visual interruptions by introducing buildings, natural features, or other monuments along their axes, with the streets either going around, changing angles (“deflected vista”), or terminating in an intersection. Make the monument distinctive and memorable, perhaps indicating the kind of human activity taking place there.

Use Local Symmetry and Human-Scale Detail to assure that the terminated vista will be appealing and memorable…

¹ For a more detailed discussion of this and many other aspects of walkable street design, see Dover, V., & Massengale, J. (2013). Street Design: The secret to great cities and towns. New York: John Wiley & Sons. For further research findings on the topic, see Clemente, O., & Ewing, R. (2005). Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Final Report prepared for the Active Living Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Princeton NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Available on the Web at https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/21519/ewingclementehandyetal_walkableurbandesign_2005.pdf?sequence=1

² Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

³ Lynch, K. (1960). Image of the City. Boston: MIT Press.

Mehaffy, M. et al. (2020). TERMINATED VISTA (pattern). In A New Pattern Language for Growing Regions. The Dalles: Sustasis Press. Available at https://pattern-language.wiki/.../Terminated_Vista

8.2. Terminated Vista

Aus Pattern Language Wiki

Therefore:

SECTION I:

PATTERNS OF SCALE

1. REGIONAL PATTERNS

2. URBAN PATTERNS

3. STREET PATTERNS

4. NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERNS

5. SPECIAL USE PATTERNS

6. PUBLIC SPACE PATTERNS

7. BLOCK AND PLOT PATTERNS

8. STREETSCAPE PATTERNS

9. BUILDING PATTERNS

10. BUILDING EDGE PATTERNS

SECTION II:

PATTERNS OF MULTIPLE SCALE

11. GEOMETRIC PATTERNS

12. AFFORDANCE PATTERNS

13. RETROFIT PATTERNS

14. INFORMAL GROWTH PATTERNS

15. CONSTRUCTION PATTERNS

SECTION III:

PATTERNS OF PROCESS

16. IMPLEMENTATION TOOL PATTERNS

17. PROJECT ECONOMICS PATTERNS

18. PLACE GOVERNANCE PATTERNS

19. AFFORDABILITY PATTERNS

20. NEW TECHNOLOGY PATTERNS